Ideas Client Service Careers About Us
Sitemap Contact
Home  > Publications   > How the U.S. can reach its energy productivity potential
Perspective - Wasted Energy: How the U.S. can reach its energy productivity potential- July 2007
Research Topic: Energy Markets
Perspective - Wasted Energy: How the U.S. Can Reach Its Energy Productivity Potential - July 2007The United States is the single biggest energy consumer in the world, even before accounting for the energy used in producing U.S. imports.

One of the main reasons behind high U.S. energy consumption is that the country has the lowest energy productivity—or the level of output that the United States achieves from the energy it consumes—of any developed economy. Each person in the United States today consumes the equivalent of almost seven gallons of oil—80 percent more energy than Northwestern Europe, 94 percent more than Japan, and seven times the level of China. As a result, the United States is also the most CO2-intensive country, producing 19 tons of CO2 per capita annually—more than twice the level of Northwestern Europe and Japan.

Almost two-thirds of U.S. energy usage today comes from consumer-driven industries, dominated mainly by road transportation and residential energy consumption. Within industrial energy demand, which accounts for 35 percent of total U.S. energy demand, chemicals is the largest sector, with 9 percent of total industrial energy usage. The rest is fragmented across diverse sectors such as steel, apparel, and food processing.

If there is no change to current policies, U.S. energy demand will accelerate slightly from its long-term growth rate to some 1.1 percent a year. Yet MGI research finds that a concerted effort to boost U.S. energy productivity—or the level of output that the United States achieves from the energy it consumes—would have spectacular results. By capturing the potential available from existing technologies with an internal rate of return of 10 percent or more, the United States has the potential to cap its energy demand, as well as its greenhouse gas emissions, at today's levels. What's more, an intensive focus on improving energy productivity would spur new markets for demand-side innovation and thus represents an important business opportunity for manufacturers, utilities, and other companies.


Launch this perspective (PDF - 1.48 MB)

PrintE-mail a Colleague
The case for investing in energy productivity
Additional annual investments in energy productivity of $170 billion through 2020 could cut global energy demand growth by at least half while generating average internal rates of return of 17 percent. Such outlays would also achieve significant energy savings and cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.
Read more
Curbing global energy demand growth: The energy productivity opportunity
There is a large opportunity to contain accelerating energy demand growth in practical, cost-effective ways and, in the process, cut CO2 emissions.
Read more
Read more on the McKinsey Quarterly
site
Launch Slideshow
Leapfrogging to higher energy productivity in China
By taking advantage only of currently existing technologies that pay for themselves, China could further its ongoing efforts and reduce total energy demand in 2020 by as much as 23 percent. Lower energy demand would also mean that China could cut its projected oil imports by up to 15 percent and its CO2 emissions by at least 20 percent by 2020.
Read more
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy   © Copyright 1996-2008 McKinsey & Company