Insights & Publications

Article| McKinsey Quarterly

China and India's financial systems: A barrier to growth

November 2006 | byDiana Farrell and Susan Lund

On the surface, the financial systems of China and India appear to have little in common: China’s—by far the larger—is dominated by a massive banking sector, while India has a strong equity market. The two systems have vastly different roots as well. The Bombay Stock Exchange along with many of India’s venerable banks trace their ancestry to the era of British rule. China’s current financial institutions are products of an economic liberalization that began only in 1978.

Yet the two countries’ financial systems, different as they are, share a common handicap: excessive government intervention that distorts the allocation of capital and consequently holds back growth. In China, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), many with low productivity, receive most of the available funds for investment in order to maintain employment levels. In India, the government itself absorbs a good deal of the country’s capital to finance its rural investment priorities and large fiscal deficit. In both countries, the results are wasteful investments that yield negligible returns, limited financing options for the private companies that drive growth, and limited investment options for consumers. To reach the next stage of development, both China and India must create a modern financial sector that allocates capital efficiently and meets the needs of savers.

Research by the McKinsey Global Institute finds that reforms to create a modern financial sector would have immense value, boosting GDP by up to $321 billion a year in China and up to $48 billion a year in India. (The two reports on which this article is based—Putting China’s capital to work: The value of financial system reform and Accelerating India’s growth through financial system reform—are available free of charge online.) For both countries, reducing government involvement in the sector and increasing its responsiveness to the market are the keys to progress. A comparison of the two systems highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each and sheds light on the specific paths to reform that these economic powerhouses must take if they are to achieve their full potential.

McKinsey Global Institute

McKinsey Global Institute

Our business and economics research arm, informing management and policy decisions since 1990.more