Insights & Publications


A mixed year for M&A

Global deal activity slowed in August, though measures of value creation continued to improve.

January 2012 | byCarsten Buch Sivertsen

M&A activity slowed in 2011 as uncertainty surrounding the European sovereign-debt crisis continued to vex the global economy. The growth that characterized the first seven months of the year came to an abrupt halt in August as the crisis heightened, accompanied by a sharp 17 percent drop in the S&P 500 and a surge in volatility.1 For the year, companies around the world announced 7,700 deals, valued at $2.7 trillion—a meager 3 percent increase from 2010.

Not surprisingly, activity among companies headquartered in Europe was most affected, falling by 26 percent between the first and second halves of 2011—compared with only an 18 and 9 percent drop among companies in the Americas and Asia, respectively. Overall, acquisitions by European companies constituted just 31 percent of M&A by volume, the lowest share for the region since 1998. Cross-border activity was also affected as Asian and US companies actively sought out deals in Europe. Although total activity for the year remained steady at the 2010 level, the amount of M&A into Europe by non-European acquirers increased to $220 billion because of a few large transactions and an increase in midsize and small acquisitions.

Despite the crisis and slowdown in activity, investors remain sanguine about deals. Our analyses showed that in 2011 they created almost as much value, measured as share price movements before and after the announcement,2 as they did in 2010—the highest in our 15 years of tracking. The net value, measured as deal value added (DVA), dropped to 12 percent, from 13 percent in 2010, but remained considerably higher than the 15-year average of around 5 percent (Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1

Acquirers also remained disciplined at capturing this value for their shareholders: the proportion of deals followed by a decline in the acquirer’s share price—the percentage of overpayers—remained low at 51 percent, significantly better than the historic average of 60 percent (Exhibit 2). This implies that investors expected that half of all deals in 2011 would destroy value for the acquirer’s shareholders, even as continued high premiums suggested that shareholders of the companies sold weren’t getting shortchanged.

Exhibit 2

About the author

Carsten Buch Sivertsen is an associate principal in McKinsey’s Oslo office.

The author would like to acknowledge the contribution of Tarun Khurana to the development of this article.

Related articles

Growing through deals A reality check

Growing through deals: A reality check

April 2011—The size and frequency of deals matter less than how companies execute them.more

Organizing for M and A McKinsey Global Survey results

Organizing for M&A: McKinsey Global Survey results

December 2011—Few executives expect the number of deals their companies start or complete to rise next year. Many indicate that there’s room to improve key planning and integration capabilities.more


The five types of successful acquisitions

July 2010—Companies advance myriad strategies for creating value with acquisitions—but only a handful are likely to do so.more


Are you still the best owner of your assets?

November 2009—As companies rethink their portfolios for the post-crisis world, they should ask themselves if they are still the best owners of their assets.more

  • includes:

When big acquisitions pay off

May 2011—Some are quietly creating value that doesn’t make the headlines. Here’s how.more


Taking a longer-term look at M&A value creation

January 2012—Companies that do many small deals can outperform their peers—if they have the right skills. But they need more than skill to succeed in large deals.more

  • includes:

About this content

The material on this page draws on the research and experience of McKinsey consultants and other sources. To learn more about our expertise, please visit the Corporate Finance Practice.